Guideline Knowledge Check – 2020 National Anaphylaxis Practice Parameters

Andrea Eberly, MD, MS, FAAEMEmergency Medicine, Family Medicine, Guideline Knowledge Check, Internal Medicine, Nurse Practitioner, Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Pediatric Medicine, Physician Assistant, Urgent Care

2020 national anaphylaxis practice parameters update

Anaphylaxis - 2020 National Practice Parameter Update

The guidelines for systematic review, and grading of
recommendations, assessment, development
and evaluation (GRADE) analysis of anaphylaxis have been updated.

Stay in step with current national guidelines. Subscribe to Med-Challenger Guideline Knowledge Checks.

Today’s Guideline Knowledge Check question comes from the desk of Med-Challenger Emergency Medicine Editor-in-Chief, Andrea Eberly, MD, FAAEM.

As many as 5% of people experience anaphylaxis in their lifetime, with medications and stinging insects being the leading causes of anaphylaxis in adults, and foods and stings being the leading causes in children. Although overall risk for death from anaphylaxis is quite low (0.3% of emergency visits or hospitalizations for anaphylaxis end with fatalities), comorbid conditions, such as uncontrolled asthma, cardiovascular disease, or advanced age, are associated with excess risk.

As many as 20% of patients experience biphasic reactions that can occur as long as 72 hours later, with potentially life-threatening symptoms. Patients with severe anaphylaxis, those who require multiple doses of epinephrine, or those with delayed administration of epinephrine are at greatest risk. Negative predictive values for a biphasic reaction after discharge are 95% and 97% for patients who are watched for 1 and 6 hours, respectively. A set of 2020 National Anaphylaxis Practice Parameters addresses biphasic anaphylaxis (recurrent anaphylaxis after first resolution)

A set of 2020 National Anaphylaxis Practice Parameters addresses biphasic anaphylaxis (recurrent anaphylaxis after first resolution). What role do antihistamines, glucocorticoids, and observation play in the prevention/early management of biphasic anaphylaxis?

A 43-year-old, healthy female without known allergies presents to the hospital with acute, generalized urticaria and wheezing. Two hours earlier she took her 3rd dose of sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim for a urinary tract infection (UTI).

On exam, she is alert, diaphoretic, with generalized urticaria. Her vitals are T 37.1 C, BP 90/59, P 125, RR 20 with mild, generalized wheezing, pulse ox 97% on room air. A cardiac monitor shows sinus tachycardia. After 2 doses of epinephrine her anaphylaxis symptoms completely resolve.

What do the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI) and the American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology (ACAAI) recommend in their just published 2020 allergy practice parameter with regards to the further management of the above patient?

Answer Options:

Give antihistamines and glucocorticoids after the second dose of epinephrine to significantly reduce incidence of biphasic anaphylaxis; discharge after resolution of anaphylaxis plus 1 hour observation of asymptomatic patient.

After resolution of symptoms, observe the asymptomatic patient for at least 6 hours; antihistamines and glucocorticoids do not reliably decrease risk of biphasic anaphylaxis and are not recommended for this purpose.

Give antihistamines and glucocorticoids to reduce incidence of biphasic anaphylaxis; admit for 24 hours to monitor for return of anaphylaxis.

Give antihistamines and glucocorticoids before or immediately after the first dose of epinephrine to significantly decrease rate of return visits for recurrent (biphasic) anaphylaxis; optimal observation time after resolution of anaphylaxis is not known, but might be as short as 1 hour.

See the Answer:

Anaphylaxis - 2020 National Practice Parameter Update

About Guideline Knowledge Checks:

With each update of national clinical practice guidelines, some recommendations change and many remain unchanged. Med-Challenger Guideline Knowledge Checks help you know both what is new and what has stayed the same in the most recent guidelines pertinent to each medical specialty.

About the Author:

Andrea Eberly, MD, FAAEM graduated from the David Geffen Medical School of Los Angeles (UCLA) and completed her residency in Emergency Medicine at the University Medical Center, Tucson, Arizona. After working as an attending physician in Tucson, she followed a recruiting call to the island of Guam, where she served in various roles, including as the director of the emergency department, the EMS Medical Director of Guam, and the Director of the 911 Call System. She has maintained her emergency medicine board certification through three cycles of American Board of Emergency Medicine Board Exams (last in 2014), all three with the help of Med-Challenger.

Related Posts

More from Med-Challenger

The Leader in Online Board Review, CME Courses, and Medical Education

Did you like this?
Get more free medical Q&A and informative CME articles.

Subscribe to the Medical Education Blog

SubscribeGet notified of more Q&A challenges.

More from Med-Challenger's Medical Education Blog

Board Review & CME Offers

Med-Challenger provides online medical education, top-rated board review courses, annual MOC and CME credit solutions for physicians, nurses, PAs and students.  Take advantage of our current offers.

2022 Cyber Sale

Save 15% on ANY ORDER with code:


including PRO bundles.

Learn More
Contact us for upgrade & bulk pricing.

Enter code at checkout. SHOP NOW.

Enter Store
See All Offers


Career Value Bundles

in your specialty.

One-time purchase.
Useful every year.

Ideal use your CME budget.

emergency medicine PRO bundle
family medicine PRO bundle
internal medicine PRO bundle
pediatric medicine PRO bundle
nurse practitioner PRO bundle
physician assistant PRO bundle

Buy or upgrade ONCE.
Save up to 55% and save time, money, and stress - every year.

View All Options