Non-Accidental Trauma & Child Abuse: Guidelines Knowledge Check

Andrea Eberly, MD, MS, FAAEMEmergency Medicine, Family Medicine, Guideline Knowledge Check, Internal Medicine, Nurse Practitioner, Nursing RN/PN, Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Pediatric Medicine, Physician Assistant, Urgent Care

non-accidental trauma and child abuse clinical guidelines knowledge check

Non-Accidental Trauma & Child Abuse

Clinical Guidelines Knowledge Check

Non-accidental trauma (NAT) is a leading cause of childhood traumatic injury and death in the United States. In the most recent data published by the National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System, there were 1,585 fatalities due to child abuse and neglect in 2015. Approximately 44% percent of those suffered death due to physical abuse and almost 75% were children <3 years old.

No care provider wants to miss non-accidental trauma and potentially expose a child to additional harm. However, mistakenly characterizing an injury as child abuse can have serious consequences for families. What follows is a guide to red flags, patterns of injury that may signal abuse, and differential diagnoses that may also account for trauma.

Stay in step with current national guidelines. Subscribe to Med-Challenger Guideline Knowledge Checks.

Today’s Guideline Knowledge Check question comes from the desk of Med-Challenger Emergency Medicine Editor-in-Chief, Andrea Eberly, MD, FAAEM.

Non-accidental trauma or suspected child abuse cases have their own unique challenges.  The first trick is recognition.

The National Child Welfare Guidelines summarize reporting requirements for child abuse. However, the true challenge is diagnosing non-accidental trauma or abuse in the first place. Many times the aspects of potential abuse aren't recognized during the treatment of the presenting trauma itself.  Plus, a mistaken diagnosis of abuse can carry it's own consequences.  So, what are current challenges and advances regarding identifying non-accidental trauma and pediatric abuse?

Try this review question and find out if you’re following the most current guideline regarding non-accidental trauma and child abuse.

A 2-year-old girl presents apneic and in asystole to the emergency department, accompanied by distraught parents who state that they found her lifeless in the morning.

They deny trauma and state that she was previously healthy. The body is still warm and without lividity.

Her abdomen is distended and shows faint central and lateral bruising (Cullen’s and Grey Turner’s signs).

A chart review shows that she presented 3 days ago for fussiness and vomiting, and that she was discharged with a diagnosis of acute gastroenteritis.

A quick post-mortem survey shows a forearm fracture; a post-mortem skeletal survey shows rib fractures and a preliminary diagnosis of non-accidental trauma (NAT) is made.

Which of the following statements is correct with regards to abuse patterns, diagnosis, and reporting obligations?

Answer Options:

Up to 10% of pediatric patients who present with major NAT have a history of recently presenting to the health care system during a sentinel abuse event was missed.

An intensive program consisting of guideline standardization, staff education, and electronic algorithms may improve adherence to age-specific guidelines for evaluating NAT from under 50% to nearly 70%.

Abdominal trauma is the leading cause of death from NAT due to the disproportionally greater challenge of diagnosing abdominal trauma due to NAT during an early presentation.

Corporal punishment laws are inconsistent from State to State, with corporal punishment being permissible in 60% of States; however, corporal punishment with an object is illegal in all USA States.

See the Answer:

non-accidental trauma and child abuse

About Guideline Knowledge Checks:

With each update of national clinical practice guidelines, some recommendations change and many remain unchanged. Med-Challenger Guideline Knowledge Checks help you know both what is new and what has stayed the same in the most recent guidelines pertinent to each medical specialty.

About the Author:

Andrea Eberly, MD, FAAEM graduated from the David Geffen Medical School of Los Angeles (UCLA) and completed her residency in Emergency Medicine at the University Medical Center, Tucson, Arizona. After working as an attending physician in Tucson, she followed a recruiting call to the island of Guam, where she served in various roles, including as the director of the emergency department, the EMS Medical Director of Guam, and the Director of the 911 Call System. She has maintained her emergency medicine board certification through three cycles of American Board of Emergency Medicine Board Exams (last in 2014), all three with the help of Med-Challenger.

Related Posts

More from Med-Challenger

The Leader in Online Board Review, CME Courses, and Medical Education

Did you like this?
Get more free medical Q&A and informative CME articles.

Subscribe to the Medical Education Blog

SubscribeGet notified of more Q&A challenges.

More from Med-Challenger's Medical Education Blog

Board Review & CME Offers

Med-Challenger provides online medical education, top-rated board review courses, annual MOC and CME credit solutions for physicians, nurses, PAs and students.  Take advantage of our current offers.

2022 Cyber Sale

Save 15% on ANY ORDER with code:


including PRO bundles.

Learn More
Contact us for upgrade & bulk pricing.

Enter code at checkout. SHOP NOW.

Enter Store
See All Offers


Career Value Bundles

in your specialty.

One-time purchase.
Useful every year.

Ideal use your CME budget.

emergency medicine PRO bundle
family medicine PRO bundle
internal medicine PRO bundle
pediatric medicine PRO bundle
nurse practitioner PRO bundle
physician assistant PRO bundle

Buy or upgrade ONCE.
Save up to 55% and save time, money, and stress - every year.

View All Options